Warning to Australia's Prime Minister Howard
Thanks, Almaniac Colin T from Queensland for forwarding this beauty:
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 46 Australian Constitution
From Peter Alexander Gargan
To John Winston Howard Member for Bennelong. House of Representatives Canberra.
15th November 2005.
Dear Sir,
BE WARNED: You are disqualified from Parliament by the Imperial Act attached to this letter, and are given a chance to resign forthwith, or face prosecution under Section 46 Australian Constitution.
There are 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, or almost one quarter of the House, and 22 (twenty two) in the Senate, and all held or could hold an office of profit under the Crown, as officers of the Supreme Court and High Court in their respective States. This means an automatic disqualification from being elected. Since employers are usually the only ones who can regularly access legal advice at the prices lawyers charge, the lawyers in parliament are a member of a class of people who receive a pecuniary benefit from the laws they pass.
This mischief was addressed and cured in this year, by an Act of the United Kingdom Parliament, of exactly the same standing as the Australian Constitution, the Imperial Act under which Parliament is constituted. This is the text.
46 Edward III AD 1372
80. Lawyers and Sheriffs excluded from Parliament
WHEREAS men of the law who follow divers businesses in the king's courts on behalf of private persons, with whom they are, do procure and cause to be brought into parliament many petitions in the name of the commons, which in no wise relate to them, but only the private persons with whom they are engaged; also sheriffs who are common officers for the people, and ought to be abiding in their office, for the doing right to every one, are named, and have heretofore been and returned to parliament knights of the shires, by the same sheriffs; it is accorded and assented in this parliament, that hereafter no man of the law following business in the king's court, nor any sheriff for the time that he is sheriff, be returned nor accepted knights of the shires; nor that they who are men of the law and sheriffs now returned to parliament have any wages; but the king willeth that knights and sergeants of the most worthy of the county be hereafter returned knights in parliament; and that they be elected in full county.
Now that you know about this enactment, which by reference to Section 143
(1) (a) , Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is strictly proved once presented in any court, you can take no further part in any proceedings in parliament, and neither can any of the other 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, and
22 in the Senate. It would appear that by reference to this Act, legislation passed recently is invalid, and was obtained by a fraud on the Constitution.
If you resign immediately, you will probably retain your pension and entitlements, unless the new Parliament strips them from you, however, for every day you continue to sit, you are liable to a penalty of $100. Your salary must also stop immediately.
Imperial enactments came to Australia in the Australian Courts Act 1828, and evidence may be found in the Australia Act 1986, in Section 11, that this legislation remains un-repealed. Much fraudulent legislation has been enacted by Parliaments that have had lawyers participating, and much work will need to be done to repair the damage. Most Courts created by the Parliament since 1970, are fraudulently constituted with your fellow lawyers as absolute power-mongers in control.
The Constitution, in Section 108, prohibits the States from repealing Imperial enactments, and Section 118 brings in all the Imperial Acts forming part of the law in 1900. Lawyers have a genetic fault in their makeup, which allows them to listen, but not hear. Section 128 Constitution prohibits Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND from assenting to such laws, without a referendum, because they are the matrix on top of which the Constitution sits like a jewel. The Imperial Acts are the foundation stones on which justice has been built.
Luke 11 Verses 46 and 52, of the Gospels that Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has taken an oath to uphold, as set out on the 1 Will and Mary C 6
(Coronation Oath) (1688) deals with lawyers, and the description is pertinent today as it was 2000 years ago. 46 Says: "Woe unto you ye lawyers, for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers." And Verse 52 says: "Woe unto you lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves , and them that were entering in ye hindered." The Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1372, passed judgment upon you, and it remains in force to this day.
By Section 61 Constitution the Governor General as a military man, and the Queen's representative in Australia is obliged to withdraw your commission, on being satisfied, on the evidence that you were a lawyer, before entering Parliament, because he is responsible for upholding the Constitution and the laws that are conditions precedent to its enactment, from the British Constitution. In Section 62 Constitution the Governor General has an absolute discretion to dismiss you, at his pleasure, and he must be displeased, at the dirty deeds you are attempting to have him consent to. He must reserve these Bills, under S 58 Constitution, and may suggest amendments under the same section.
Before the Queen may allow these fundamental changes to the Australian Constitution she must withhold Her pleasure until a referendum is held under section 128 Constitution.
This is the warning you are entitled to as a Christian from Matthew 18 Verse
15, but should you not heed it, then you may expect further action promptly.
Yours sincerely
Peter Alexander Gargan.
Schedule: Carbon Copies to:
The Governor General of Australia The President of the ACTU The Secretary of the ACTU. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. The Chief of the Federal Police. The Australian Broadcasting Commission. The Electoral Commission. Chief Justice of the High Court.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Tagged: australia, politics, humor, humour, political+humor
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 46 Australian Constitution
From Peter Alexander Gargan
To John Winston Howard Member for Bennelong. House of Representatives Canberra.
15th November 2005.
Dear Sir,
BE WARNED: You are disqualified from Parliament by the Imperial Act attached to this letter, and are given a chance to resign forthwith, or face prosecution under Section 46 Australian Constitution.
There are 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, or almost one quarter of the House, and 22 (twenty two) in the Senate, and all held or could hold an office of profit under the Crown, as officers of the Supreme Court and High Court in their respective States. This means an automatic disqualification from being elected. Since employers are usually the only ones who can regularly access legal advice at the prices lawyers charge, the lawyers in parliament are a member of a class of people who receive a pecuniary benefit from the laws they pass.
This mischief was addressed and cured in this year, by an Act of the United Kingdom Parliament, of exactly the same standing as the Australian Constitution, the Imperial Act under which Parliament is constituted. This is the text.
46 Edward III AD 1372
80. Lawyers and Sheriffs excluded from Parliament
WHEREAS men of the law who follow divers businesses in the king's courts on behalf of private persons, with whom they are, do procure and cause to be brought into parliament many petitions in the name of the commons, which in no wise relate to them, but only the private persons with whom they are engaged; also sheriffs who are common officers for the people, and ought to be abiding in their office, for the doing right to every one, are named, and have heretofore been and returned to parliament knights of the shires, by the same sheriffs; it is accorded and assented in this parliament, that hereafter no man of the law following business in the king's court, nor any sheriff for the time that he is sheriff, be returned nor accepted knights of the shires; nor that they who are men of the law and sheriffs now returned to parliament have any wages; but the king willeth that knights and sergeants of the most worthy of the county be hereafter returned knights in parliament; and that they be elected in full county.
Now that you know about this enactment, which by reference to Section 143
(1) (a) , Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is strictly proved once presented in any court, you can take no further part in any proceedings in parliament, and neither can any of the other 32 lawyers in the House of Representatives, and
22 in the Senate. It would appear that by reference to this Act, legislation passed recently is invalid, and was obtained by a fraud on the Constitution.
If you resign immediately, you will probably retain your pension and entitlements, unless the new Parliament strips them from you, however, for every day you continue to sit, you are liable to a penalty of $100. Your salary must also stop immediately.
Imperial enactments came to Australia in the Australian Courts Act 1828, and evidence may be found in the Australia Act 1986, in Section 11, that this legislation remains un-repealed. Much fraudulent legislation has been enacted by Parliaments that have had lawyers participating, and much work will need to be done to repair the damage. Most Courts created by the Parliament since 1970, are fraudulently constituted with your fellow lawyers as absolute power-mongers in control.
The Constitution, in Section 108, prohibits the States from repealing Imperial enactments, and Section 118 brings in all the Imperial Acts forming part of the law in 1900. Lawyers have a genetic fault in their makeup, which allows them to listen, but not hear. Section 128 Constitution prohibits Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND from assenting to such laws, without a referendum, because they are the matrix on top of which the Constitution sits like a jewel. The Imperial Acts are the foundation stones on which justice has been built.
Luke 11 Verses 46 and 52, of the Gospels that Her Majesty ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has taken an oath to uphold, as set out on the 1 Will and Mary C 6
(Coronation Oath) (1688) deals with lawyers, and the description is pertinent today as it was 2000 years ago. 46 Says: "Woe unto you ye lawyers, for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers." And Verse 52 says: "Woe unto you lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves , and them that were entering in ye hindered." The Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1372, passed judgment upon you, and it remains in force to this day.
By Section 61 Constitution the Governor General as a military man, and the Queen's representative in Australia is obliged to withdraw your commission, on being satisfied, on the evidence that you were a lawyer, before entering Parliament, because he is responsible for upholding the Constitution and the laws that are conditions precedent to its enactment, from the British Constitution. In Section 62 Constitution the Governor General has an absolute discretion to dismiss you, at his pleasure, and he must be displeased, at the dirty deeds you are attempting to have him consent to. He must reserve these Bills, under S 58 Constitution, and may suggest amendments under the same section.
Before the Queen may allow these fundamental changes to the Australian Constitution she must withhold Her pleasure until a referendum is held under section 128 Constitution.
This is the warning you are entitled to as a Christian from Matthew 18 Verse
15, but should you not heed it, then you may expect further action promptly.
Yours sincerely
Peter Alexander Gargan.
Schedule: Carbon Copies to:
The Governor General of Australia The President of the ACTU The Secretary of the ACTU. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. The Chief of the Federal Police. The Australian Broadcasting Commission. The Electoral Commission. Chief Justice of the High Court.
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
Tagged: australia, politics, humor, humour, political+humor
Pip Wilson posted item above at 4:04 PM | Permalink
1 Comments:
Did this guy really send this to the PM??
I tell ya, without lawyers in the political system there might actually be some progress in this world!!! And that extends not just to Oz, but the whole world!
Post a Comment
<< Home