*Ø* "The president was utterly incoherent"
So sayeth the New York Times, and far be it from me to disagree on this occasion. The NYT gives an opinion that pretty much echoes my own. I'm talking of course, about the "Town Hall Debate". (2 am to 3.30 am my time in Dublin last night, so I'm now in the class of the walking dead!)
Excerpt:
"One of the uncommitted voters in the audience sensibly asked President Bush to name three mistakes he'd made in office, and what he had done to remedy the damage. Mr. Bush declined to list even one, and instead launched into an impassioned defense of the invasion of Iraq as a good idea. The president's insistence on defending his decision to go into Iraq seemed increasingly bizarre in a week when his own investigators reported that there were no weapons of mass destruction there, and when his own secretary of defense acknowledged that there was no serious evidence of a connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.
"Even worse, the president's refusal to come up with even a minor error -- apart from saying that he might have made some unspecified appointments that he now regretted -- underscores his inability to respond to failure in any way except by insisting over and over again that his original decision was right.
"Unfortunately, for long stretches of the evening, the format did not lead to such telling responses. On occasion, the arguments were impossible to follow. Heaven help any citizen who relied on last night's debate to understand what is going on with North Korea or who tried to understand the fight about tax cuts on Subchapter S corporations. [I do have to wonder why anyone would have to rely on this 'debate' (32 pages of rules?) to know what's going on with North Korea. Or anything or anywhere else. - N]
"Mr. Bush was deeply unpersuasive when asked why he had not permitted the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada. He claimed that the reason was 'I want to make sure it cures you and doesn't kill you'. Mr. Kerry cleanly retorted that four years ago in a campaign debate, Mr. Bush had said importing medicine from Canada sounded sensible.
"And the president was utterly incoherent when asked about whom he might name to the Supreme Court in a second term. His comment about how he didn't want to offend any judges because he wanted 'them all voting for me' was a joke -- but an unfortunate one, given the fact that the president owes his job to a Supreme Court vote." [my emphasis - N]
Full text here Or you'll get it at truthout.org
Full debate transcript and video
So sayeth the New York Times, and far be it from me to disagree on this occasion. The NYT gives an opinion that pretty much echoes my own. I'm talking of course, about the "Town Hall Debate". (2 am to 3.30 am my time in Dublin last night, so I'm now in the class of the walking dead!)
Excerpt:
"One of the uncommitted voters in the audience sensibly asked President Bush to name three mistakes he'd made in office, and what he had done to remedy the damage. Mr. Bush declined to list even one, and instead launched into an impassioned defense of the invasion of Iraq as a good idea. The president's insistence on defending his decision to go into Iraq seemed increasingly bizarre in a week when his own investigators reported that there were no weapons of mass destruction there, and when his own secretary of defense acknowledged that there was no serious evidence of a connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.
"Even worse, the president's refusal to come up with even a minor error -- apart from saying that he might have made some unspecified appointments that he now regretted -- underscores his inability to respond to failure in any way except by insisting over and over again that his original decision was right.
"Unfortunately, for long stretches of the evening, the format did not lead to such telling responses. On occasion, the arguments were impossible to follow. Heaven help any citizen who relied on last night's debate to understand what is going on with North Korea or who tried to understand the fight about tax cuts on Subchapter S corporations. [I do have to wonder why anyone would have to rely on this 'debate' (32 pages of rules?) to know what's going on with North Korea. Or anything or anywhere else. - N]
"Mr. Bush was deeply unpersuasive when asked why he had not permitted the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada. He claimed that the reason was 'I want to make sure it cures you and doesn't kill you'. Mr. Kerry cleanly retorted that four years ago in a campaign debate, Mr. Bush had said importing medicine from Canada sounded sensible.
"And the president was utterly incoherent when asked about whom he might name to the Supreme Court in a second term. His comment about how he didn't want to offend any judges because he wanted 'them all voting for me' was a joke -- but an unfortunate one, given the fact that the president owes his job to a Supreme Court vote." [my emphasis - N]
Full text here Or you'll get it at truthout.org
Full debate transcript and video
Nora posted item above at 1:00 AM | Permalink
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home