Thursday, December 22, 2005

Has Hussein been beaten and tortured?

"I want to say here, yes, we have been beaten by the Americans and we have been tortured," Saddam told the court before gesturing toward his seven co-defendants, "one by one."
Source


I doubt it very much. Saddam Hussein is a nasty muhfuh, and he'll say anything, not to beat this rap, because he knows he can't, but for propaganda purposes (although it's too late for that; he is yesterday's bastard).

The other reason I doubt it is because even Bush's horrible administration wouldn't be that stupid. They have been torturing uncounted people all around the globe -- it's these muhfuhs' stock in trade -- but they are electroding and savaging only the powerless and unknown. I doubt they would expose themselves by torturing a celebrity because it would soon get out (I wish they would start with Schwarzenegger and Pat Robertson). Have his co-accused been beaten and tortured? That's much more likely under Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of their gung-ho pro-torture gang.

The other compelling bit of evidence, though by no means conclusive, is that Saddam Hussein neither provided any photos of injuries, nor stripped off to show the bruises and scars. Hussein is savvy enough to know that if he did some courtroom theatrics, he would get half the world on side, but he kept his shirt on.

No, he's just another political leader full of shit. Another one who deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison.

By the way, why do the US press always call him by his first name? They didn't do that with Adolph, Joseph or Henry.

Tagged: , , ,

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if the fact that he didn't strip off and show bruises or scars had anything to do with being a Muslim? AFAIK, he's not known for being particularly religious, and he ran a secular state, but he's still a Muslim, and (not that I'm good on detail here) isn't it prohibited (or strongly disapproved of) to strip in public? Even for men?

Having said that, I take your point 100% about the Rummy/Cheney cabal being too canny to have tortured him -- whatever about the others.

(I have no OE. I'm on IE on this yoke.)

12:53 AM  
Blogger Pip Wilson said...

Good point about the religious considerations. You have no MSOE? How will you live?

1:08 AM  
Blogger TheFishmonger said...

The call him by first name because Hussein is such a common name in the arab world. For instance, King Hussein of Jordan springs to mind. Calling him by first name avoids confusion.

4:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was on another computer.

Me without OE?? Intolerable!

12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regarding the Saddam v. Hussein "naming" thing:

See this:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/saddam_hussein.html

Looks like it's complicated.

1:53 PM  
Blogger Pip Wilson said...

What an indredibly comprehensive bit of journalism -- but it leaves me with no firm conclusion. That is, I can't find a conclusive answer, or perhaps I missed a sentence. Thanks Nora.

2:02 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker